Why Is Microsoft Now Finally Being More Aggressive Pushing SkyDrive?
IF what the very solid rumor i got ahold to is to be true. SkyDrive's new more aggressive stance is a response not to iCloud. But to DropBox surge in 2011 and they releasing their API a month or so ago. With things like iCloud and CloudApp being more of secondary reasons. Yet regardless of the why. The fact is that Microsoft has started responding loudly.
I always said that the reasons why Microsoft didn't pushed SkyDrive hard before was because of the state of competition not being worth it, against the cost and complexity of running SkyDrive. People just don't have a clue how incredibly costly and complex is to run a service like SkyDrive at the scale and reach Microsoft has ran it since 2007 alone. In perspective, running SkyDrive is as costly and complex as let's say something like Xbox Live. Just that is it don't appears to be so.
But cost and complexity are the reasons why a Google Cloud Drive – or whatever it gets to be called in the end – has still to come out and is only presumably to be released in the next I/O conference.
Once the state of competition reached a point where Microsoft has validated the need for they to respond as it is now. Microsoft now has given the green light to start reacting. And from the already dozens of moves and bets Microsoft is making now that they no longer have to hold back. You can expect a very aggressive Microsoft in 2012. That is already very clear to me.
In the end it is also great that SkyDrive is now being used as a Power Play by Microsoft. It has been the best cloud storage service overall since it was released.
But with the new updates, the new API and apps. Now Microsoft is finally aiming to make it the very best BY FAR. DropBox free run in the space is now officially over.
.
.
Labels
Categories
Posts Archive
- February 2017 ( 2 )
- January 2017 ( 3 )
- July 2014 ( 1 )
- February 2014 ( 3 )
- January 2014 ( 5 )
- December 2013 ( 2 )
- November 2013 ( 2 )
- October 2013 ( 4 )
- September 2013 ( 7 )
- June 2013 ( 9 )
- May 2013 ( 1 )
- December 2012 ( 2 )
- November 2012 ( 2 )
- August 2012 ( 1 )
- March 2012 ( 7 )
- February 2012 ( 5 )
- January 2012 ( 15 )
- December 2011 ( 17 )
- November 2011 ( 6 )
- October 2011 ( 20 )
- September 2011 ( 19 )
- August 2011 ( 12 )
- July 2011 ( 3 )
- May 2011 ( 10 )
- April 2011 ( 7 )
- March 2011 ( 18 )
- February 2011 ( 10 )
- January 2011 ( 10 )
- December 2010 ( 16 )
- November 2010 ( 15 )
- October 2010 ( 15 )
- September 2010 ( 15 )
- August 2010 ( 30 )
- July 2010 ( 29 )
- June 2010 ( 7 )
- May 2010 ( 15 )
- April 2010 ( 20 )
- March 2010 ( 7 )
- February 2010 ( 10 )
- January 2010 ( 10 )
- December 2009 ( 27 )
- November 2009 ( 46 )
- October 2009 ( 23 )
- September 2009 ( 3 )
- July 2009 ( 3 )
2 comments :
Problem is there's a cost in being perceived as a laggard.
@Anonymous True, an image cost. Never stated differently.
Post a Comment
Welcome To Appatic.com
Please comment away. You can expect on me always replying to you if you direct the comment to me. Your comments do serve as a way to support the blog too, as comments in a post do help traffic.
Also do so to point out if a link is dead, an app has changed or to suggest a related app. That way i can fix or edit the post accordingly a lot faster.
If you liked this blog post, Please subscribe the blog feed using the link below:
Subscribe To Appatic